Despite breast cancer being the most common cancer in women worldwide, in Bosnia and Herzegovina there is no accurate data on breast cancer patients, nor any centralised guidelines.
Dr Lejla Hadžikadić-Gušić, a breast surgical oncologist, took on the task of creating the first multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of breast cancer in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Read more in Research Outreach
Read the original research: doi:10.17305/bjbms.2022.7504
Image Source: DepositPhotos / DatsenkoMarina
Transcript:
Hello and welcome to Research Pod! Thank you for listening and joining us today.
In this episode we look at the work of Dr Lejla Hadžikadić-Gušić, a breast surgical oncologist of the Department of Surgical Oncology at the Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, USA. She is originally from Bosnia and Herzegovina and has a vested interest in advancement of health care in her native country. Because no accurate data on breast cancer patients exists in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hadžikadić-Gušić and colleagues have collectively undertook the difficult task of forming the first multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of breast cancer for this area.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, responsible for approximately 685,000 deaths per year. The main specialities involved in the management of breast cancer are medical oncology, which deals with systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and endocrine therapy; surgery, which removes the tumor cells; and radiotherapy, which uses high-energy rays or particles that destroy cancer cells to treat, shrink, or prevent breast cancer from coming back. A multidisciplinary team approach is the cornerstone of breast cancer care.
The intersection of all three disciplines relies on the available breast cancer information in a population. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, institutions that monitor breast cancer patients can offer optimal treatment options. In some countries though, including Bosnia and Herzegovina, there is no accurate data on breast cancer patients, treatments, or deaths, mainly because of the lack of a central registry to collect such information.
In 2021, the annual Bosnian Herzegovinian American Academy of Arts and Sciences conference took place in Mostar, a city in the south of B&H. A roundtable of specialists from B&H and the diaspora was held as part of this conference and coordinated by Dr Lejla Hadžikadić-Gušić of the Department of Surgical Oncology at the Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, USA. Many breast cancer specialists took part in a consortium formed with the aim to create the first set of guidelines for the management of breast cancer in B&H.
The process was evidence-based and took each speciality into account. The team also considered local circumstances and available resources, including patients’ access to health institutions and available treatments. Finally, all involved specialists agreed and approved the guidelines created at the 2021 consortium. These guidelines included instructions and recommendations for each relevant speciality including radiology, pathology, genetics, surgery, oncology, and radiotherapy. When it comes to imaging required for breast cancer screening, the team strongly recommends a mammogram for all women over 40, while an earlier test should be considered for women who have a family member with breast cancer.
When an abnormality is found on a screening mammogram, the researchers advise that this gets investigated by performing extra imaging such as a diagnostic mammogram including an ultrasound scan, and/or MRI and needle biopsies – the procedure of taking tissue samples for examination under the microscope using a needle – of any breast or axillary abnormalities. Although not currently performed in all centres in B&H, marking the tumour before surgery by inserting a guide wire is also strongly recommended. The team states that all tests should be completed within a month from the initial findings and that all patients should go through a multidisciplinary team meeting where their further management will be decided.
For women with a high risk of breast cancer, for example with a higher than 20% lifelong risk, the use of MRI and mammography alternately every six months is recommended. The use of MRI is also proposed for women that are found to carry a genetic mutation or gene variants that increase the lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.
Pathology is the medical speciality that enables the diagnosis of diseases by analysing tissue samples. The recommendations regarding this specific field include testing all cancerous growths for oestrogen and progesterone receptors as well as for Her2 receptors on the tumour tissue – and including the grade of the cancer in the final report. They also strongly advise that the pathology report is not delayed more than ten days after the specimen gets sent to the lab and that all reporting centres use the latest standards for the classification of the disease based on current American Joint Committee on Cancer standards. Reporting the residual cancer burden class, following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, is also critically important for prognostic information.
The team recommended genetic testing for all patients that were of high risk for breast cancer, including a test for breast cancer genes such as, but not limited to, BRCA-1/BRCA-2. More specifically, they defined as high risk any woman who either has a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer before the age of 40, or individuals that have multiple cancers, cancers at a young age, or any other cancer associated with the BRCA1/BRCA2 or other genes in a member of their family. When available, genetic testing should be initiated and followed by genetic counselling to discuss the necessity and meaning of the results of the tests with the patient and their families, as well as their options.
Breast cancer can, in most cases, be treated with surgery, which may be followed by chemotherapy, or more specifically, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or all three. A multidisciplinary approach usually offers higher chances of survival and lower chances of tumour recurrence. To remove the cancer from the breast, the surgeon either removes the whole affected breast or just the tumour in addition to axillary surgery with either a sentinel lymph node biopsy, which is recommended and preferred where available, or with the removal of all the axilla nodes, known as an axillary dissection.
The team recommends that, where possible, surgeons should try to preserve the breast, especially since there is no evidence that a more aggressive surgical approach improves survival rates, while preserving the breasts can have a positive effect on the patients’ wellbeing and body image. The team also advises that surgeons should consider bilateral mastectomies and immediate reconstruction of the breasts by a plastic surgeon for women that have a genetic breast cancer mutation.
When it comes to investigating the possible spread of the disease to the axilla in patients with no obvious node involvement that go for surgery, the team recommends a sentinel lymph node biopsy with the use of two different dyes to identify any cancer tissue in the axillary nodes. The removal and testing of at least three nodes lowers the false negative rate of the test and provides the most information to help guide adjuvant treatment recommendations. The results of the sentinel lymph node biopsy will give the surgeon and multidisciplary team information to determine the need to proceed to an axillary dissection, or removal of all of the lymph nodes, or proceed to another treatment that is individualized for each patientfor a patient-centric approach.
Undergoing chemotherapy before definitive oncologic surgery can lower the stage of the disease by shrinking the tumour itself and in some cases by eliminating some foci of disease in the lymph nodes. This often allows the surgeon to perform less aggressive surgery such as a lumpectomy rather than a mastectomy. In some cases, this can help the woman avoid an axillary dissection and all the associated risks that accompany that surgery, such as lymphoedema.
The team recommends consideration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for women with palpable tumours over 2cm in size, women with triple-negative breast cancer – cancer that has tested negative for ER, PR and Her2 receptors – and women with Her2 positive breast cancer, or women with biopsy proven nodal involvement. The requirements for adjuvant systemic therapy depend on the pathology results of the surgical specimen.
Further specialised molecular profiling tests, such as Oncotype Dx and MammaPrint, are encouraged for oestrogen positive tumours if the financial circumstances permit to aid in decision making for the need for chemotherapy. The team also strongly advises that Tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor should be taken by women with ER positive disease. Immunotherapy agents should be considered where appropriate and available for use.
In the case that breast cancer has spread beyond the breast and axilla, or metastatic disease, some of the consortium’s recommendations include the administration of single or dual therapies with Pertuzumab for Her2 positive cancers, hormone therapy for hormone positive cancers, and chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancers. It is proposed that these women also get tested for PD-L1 protein, a test that indicates what type of chemotherapy regimen is effective. For these treatments, the team strongly advocates considering the availability of referral of the patient to a centre with access to clinical trials.
Radiotherapy after surgery can also reduce the chances of local recurrence or the cancer coming back. The experts advise that women undergoing breast conservation surgery should be offered adjuvant radiotherapy. After mastectomy, radiotherapy should be administered for node positive disease, positive resection margins and high-risk disease, ideally within 4–6 weeks from surgery.
In summary, with the above evidence-based recommendations and available regional resources taken in mind, the consortium specialists aimed to create the first set of national guidelines for the management of breast cancer in B&H. For these to be put to good use, they also strongly propose the establishment of a central registry. The registry will be responsible for monitoring and filing data for each patient, a process that has been previously shown to help optimise patient care and treatment outcomes. Through their research, Hadžikadić-Gušić and colleagues aim to support breast cancer healthcare providers nationwide and help the Ministry of Health identify any system deficiencies. In this way, they hope to confidently provide the resources and services required to raise the standards of care for patients with breast cancer in B&H.
That’s all for this episode – thanks for listening. Links to the original research can be found in the shownotes for this episode. And, as always, stay subscribed to Research Pod for more of the latest science!
See you again soon.
Leave a Reply